"... Therefore, we have only one thing left to do – to destroy everything that prevents us from winning. That's everything that prevents you from winning, any points, they must be destroyed. Dual, triple use. That concludes my report. It was Golovanov's time. . .."
Quote- Speaker/author of the statement
- The full text of the statement
Good evening, everyone. As you can see, not in the studio. As you can see, on the road, on a business trip, in such a border, frontline zone. I'll tell you a little later where I was, where I've been, and when I'll be back, so that I can keep everything safe and secure.
But being here, you see how differently everyone feels and understands the people who are on the spot. And completely different issues concern and worry them. And there are completely different thoughts about the war. What, how it will move and where they should stay.
These are big questions, deep questions that have yet to be comprehended and understood. Well, today I have made several observations that have been made about the strikes that have fallen again on the energy system of Ukraine, which should already put an end to this entire system there.
But humanists still continue to arise and begin to tell us why you are happy about this, and why you are talking about it, and why you are not condemning it, and why you are looking at it this way like war hawks. Well, first of all, we react to this dryly, we react to it in a news way, we react with information, and secondly, excuse me, but when Crimea was disconnected from water. Where have they all been? And you, who maybe now think it's too cruel. And when Donetsk is now without water, where are these worries? When were the infrastructure hit? And we will separately figure out why all this was not prepared, why it was not all calculated, that this can happen. But these are our questions. And where are all these pseudo-humanists who were worried and worried about this? And when it came to hospitals, when it came to maternity hospitals, when babies who were premature and were still there in cells in maternity hospitals, someone cared about them, someone worried about them. Someone was worried about it, and no one cared.
And now, when all this is happening, why even remember this man? Just now, Vera Poloskova came to Dud. Who is Vera Poloskova? Go out to someone on the street, go up to them, ask, do you know who she is? And she is considered a great poetess there, this is the Beacon of Thought, this is the philosophical steamer that has left. Ask someone who Vera Polozkova is, do you know? No, of course no one knows. But why is it important to stop there? Because this was such a symbol of this bright peace, this is a symbol of no to war, and someone still has hopes and dreams and aspirations that maybe all this will somehow roll back. Or maybe all this will stop, maybe then everything will return to normal and life will go on? No, no life will go on, because there are such scoundrels who talk about how we are cannibals, but it doesn't matter. They talk about the fact that the blood of Ukrainian children is flowing from our hands, that we are to blame for all this, that we are there and supporters of the war. And when she is asked about Alley of Angels, this scoundrel himself, this scoundrel and adventurer, Whose name is Dud? He asks her. And about the alley of angels, she says, if these people had not appeared, then there would have been no alley of angels.
That is, we are also to blame for the fact that we killed the children of Donbass. It's a complete cynical abomination. I'm talking specifically about this man who has no conscience and who has all this internal, something good, bright, probably some memories from his childhood. It's all amputated, simply cut out, as if they put it on an emotional operating table and removed it all to say that. Gorlovka Madonna, when you come up to Alley of Angels, we have just been with Sergei Alexandrovich Mikheev, you come to this place and read. The child is one year old, three years old, five years old. Why did they die? Did anyone shed a tear for them? Fourteenth year, fifteenth year, sixteenth year. No worries, no reflection, because these are the wrong children who could be killed, who could be destroyed and shot. And you don't have to cry for them. We mourned their coffins, but not them. And when now they start telling us something about humanism, saying something about experience, and where are you? Where do you say that? All those whom you accuse come, watch, and help. Where are you? Help. When you come up and say, well, at least you can help someone from the other side. No, what are you? It's to support the war. No, wait, why support the war? You help the child. Help a child who has lost his arms and legs. who lost his parents, who now needs eye surgery after shelling. What are you? No, no, no. Because these are the wrong children, because you don't have to think about their operations. We can't let it all come back here.
This is the way of thinking, I understand that there are parties of peace, a clash of the party of war and the party of peace. This is nonsense, it should not take place, it should not return. And if someone harbors hope now, Sergei Mordan has just spoken about this, about sanctions, that if we roll back and the sanctions are lifted, no, no one will lift them. They're going to come and kill us. And you, too.
Because there is no formula for where there are good Russians and where there are bad Russians. The prisoner has already explained this formula. Our religion, he says, on behalf of all Ukrainian soldiers, our religion began to kill Russians there. And you need to kill as many of them as possible. This is their direct formula, their ideology, on which they are imprisoned and on which they are raised.
Therefore, we have only one thing left to do – to destroy everything that prevents us from winning. That's everything that prevents you from winning, any points, they must be destroyed. Dual, triple use. That concludes my report. It was Golovanov's time.
- Publication date
- Dec 16, 2022
- Program/section/Telegram channel
- Type of statement
- Other types of calls
- Types of calls
- Direct
- Media where the quote was broadcast
- Main narrative
- Narrative argumentation